Nate McLouth Traded To Braves

Nate McLouth has been sent to Atlanta for three minor-league players.  I am not thrilled about the trade as I see it as another dumping of payroll by the Pirates cheap front office.  McLouth was an All-Star and the closest thing Pittsburgh had to offensive consistency.

Internet traffic has mixed reviews.  The Pirate fans are split in the sense that Andrew McCutchen now can be called up and will play very very soon.  Look for that to happen tomorrow.  Some people saw McLouth as an overachiever with a Gold Glove and an All-Star appearance. 

Who’s next?  My guess is either Paul Maholm, or a catcher when Ryan Doumit returns.  I think the Pirates are trying to push Jaramillo’s stock up and will keep Robinson Diaz to back Doumit up.  Then again, who knows if Doumit is safe

For the people who liked the trade and think it is wise to take in three 20 and 21 year-old Braves farmhands:  Have you learned nothing since 1990?  Everything good goes away and gets better elsewhere.  Has the Jason Bay thing been forgotten?  Sharpen your pencils, Bonds, Bonilla, Bay, and now McLouth?  Sorry, I don’t buy it unless McCutchen absolutely sets the world on fire when he gets to PNC Park.

The three players the Pirates got in the deal are pitchers Jeff Locke and Charlie Morton, and OF Gorkys Hernandez.

2 Responses to “Nate McLouth Traded To Braves”

  • I actually called my good friend Dr. Kato, a big Bucs fan, yesterday to tell him I liked the deal. But I think it’s because I’m not as high on McClouth as some others are.

    Yes he won a gold glove, but that’s overrated (Raffy Palmeiro won a GG in a year in which he played 13 games in the field) and he was an all-star last year (but would he have been if he wasn’t the Pirates’ required rep?). At the end of the day, I think he’s a .275-.280 hitter with 25 homers and 25-30 steals. Good numbers, sure, but there are plenty of players who put up those numbers and aren’t superstars. But because the Pirates are so bereft of offensive talent, he looks like Willie Mays.

    When this current administration took over, the organization had a bare cupboard when it came to talent- especially major-league ready. Because of the moves they’ve made they finally have some of that now (McCutcheon, Bixler, Pearce, Steven Jackson, Tabata, etc.) and they’re going to need places for these guys to play. If they think that McCutcheon is ready and that he’ll be a better player than what they have now, they have to free up that space.

    Now, you might ask “why not get McClouth and McCutcheon on the field together?” I think they could if they were in a different situation. There are so many holes that they need to fill, I think they looked at the situation and saw an opportunity to maximize on McClouth’s value and add needed pieces to the organization. If they hold on to both, does it make them a better team in the long run? Maybe. But it’s probably more likely that instead of losing a game 4-2 they’d be losing 4-3. I don’t think McClouth is that big a difference maker to justify not taking advantage of a situation and maxing out his value. Essentially, they got 4 players for McClouth because they received pretty highly regarded prospects and freed up a spot for McCutcheon to play everyday.

    Now, did they get enough in return? That’s debatable and only time will tell (I love reading how other teams would have offerend more than the Braves did- how do we know that?). Will McClouth go on to have an all-star season or career (like Bay) or will he have hit his high water mark and settle as a mid-level player (like Nady- a deal that looks better each day for the Pirates and worse for someone like me who is a Yankee fan). Again, perhaps because he’s the best player on that team (which might be akin to being the world’s tallest midget), fans could have a distorted view of his value. He’s not Mark Teixeria. He’s not Johan Santana. Or CC Sabathia. He’s not a guy who is going to net the very top prospects from a team like those guys did. However, right now he is a good enough trade piece to get some quality talent that a lot of people think can play the game at a very high level. For a organization that sorely lacks talent like that, it’s worth the gamble. They weren’t going to the playoffs with McClouth being the best player on their team. He’s not that type of player.

    I don’t think this is the Pirates management continuing a trend of being cheap, as the previous group did. I think this group is genuinely trying to max out its opportunities to build the organization from top to bottom to sustain success in the long term. I know after 16 losing seasons, the fan base doesn’t have much patience, but the organization was so poorly mismanaged for a decade that it will take some time. But, it can be done.

    Again, guys are prospects for a reason and all three may fizzle out and McClouth goes on to be a 8-time all-star. I wouldn’t bet on that, but it could happen. Prospects are called that for a reason. But if I’m the Pirates, I’ll take that chance because if it works out it can sustain me for several years of competing, not just keeping this team as is presently constructed to finish maybe finish 5 games under .500 by the end of the year.

  • (Not as) Big Mo… You make many good points, but I still think they could have gotten Jordan Shaffer since the Braves are unhappy with him anyway. Half of a Tom Glavine would be better than all of a Gorzellany or Chacon, the Pirates could have asked for him. The Pirates have gone the “prospects” route you speak of for over 15 years and it hasn’t amounted to a .500 season yet.

    How long will the baseball fans of Pittsburgh be bamboozled by this scheme?

    I hope you are right and I also hope I can say I am wrong, but I have two things on my side in this debate, – history and progress. The Pirates have shown nothing to either of those two things in a very long time.

Leave a Reply